Nuketown
erilar said,

Tue, 07/22/2008 - 9:32am

I agree with E.G. that PG-13 was sufficient, but some of the scenes were definitely pushing the envelope.

I took my 12-yr-old son, and he didn't seem disturbed. If I had seen the movie first myself, I would still have taken Zack to see it, but with us and not a group of his friends, per se. I'd always prefer that we're there to discuss anything that bothered him, etc.

All that said, my worry with the PG-13 rating is that it won't be enough to dissuade parents from taking even *younger* kids. Too many parents will be thinking, "It's a comic book movie - how disturbing can it be?" Example: there was a mother sitting behind us in the theater with two kids that could only have been 5 yrs old. Not good.

Edit: One more comment. I'm pretty certain that for marketing reasons, the producers did everything possible to obtain the PG-13 rating (vs. R) to ensure a broader audience.

-----------------------------------------
http://ditlog.blogspot.com/
A busy gamer dad shares his thoughts on gaming, geek life, and other eclectic topics of the day.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <h3><h4><a> <em> <strong><i> <b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><span><img><blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options